Reliance Jio threatens action against COAI over ‘defamatory’ remarks
COAI says its differences are with regulator, not operator
Reliance Jio on Friday responded to the recent comments by the Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI) which alleged the telecom regulator TRAI of favouring a 'certain operator'.
Jio said that the COAI had become a mouthpiece of incumbents like Airtel and is issuing "defamatory" and "malicious" statements.
Accusing industry body COAI of allegedly playing into the hands of large operators and acting as their "mouthpiece", Jio warned that it "reserves its rights to initiate criminal and civil defamation proceedings, including damages, against both COAI and Incumbent Dominant Operators (IDOs)".
Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI) was not immediately available for comments, despite several attempts.
In a strongly-worded letter to COAI yesterday, Jio said that the press release issued by the industry body on February 20, 2018 claiming that the regulator's orders put all but one operator at a serious disadvantage was "intentionally, wrongfully and maliciously made to induce disparaging and inimical opinions against Reliance Jio".
The statement of COAI, "warrants criminal and civil action for defamation", Jio said, demanding a public apology from COAI and its Director General Rajan Mathews within 48 hours.
In the seven page letter, Reliance Jio (RJIL) offered a point-by-point rebuttal to charges levelled by COAI, and said that the industry's body contention that order was strengthening the ambitions of "one particular operator" was malicious and false.
"COAI, as it is accustomed, has equated yet another telecom reform benefitting the consumer as only benefitting RJIL," Jio alleged.
Jio also alleged that the COAI has "reduced to becoming instrument and mouthpiece of Bharti Airtel, Vodafone and Idea", and termed these operators as Incumbent Dominant Operators.
"The Press Release is motivated by the aim of devaluing the esteem, regard and confidence enjoyed by RJIL, thus causing injury to RJIL's repute among the public and in the market," Jio alleged.
The press release merely advances the interests of IDOs while prejudicing the interests of the industry at large, including the consumers, Jio claimed.
Jio - which is also a member of COAI - further claimed it was kept in the dark about the release issued by the trade body.
"It appears that the IDOs amongst themselves sat together, conspired and deliberated on the matter and instigated the COAI to issue the Press Release with malicious intent to cause harm to the reputation of RJIL," Jio claimed.
The full-blown war of words comes just days after cellular operators under the aegis of COAI alleged that TRAI's regulations, including its rules and definition of predatory pricing, had distorted the market.
COAI had also alleged that the orders appeared "to be strengthening the ambitions of one particular operator with deep pockets and monopolistic designs at the expense of other operators" although it did not name Reliance Jio which has hit the incumbent operators hard by its aggressive pricing of mobile services, especially data tariffs.
The association had also stated that majority of its members agreed with the assessment of TRAI's regulations, except Reliance Jio which had a divergent view on the matter.
Responding to Reliance Jio's 48-hour ultimatum for a public apology for its "defamatory statements" wherein COAI had said it is likely to drag the telecom regulator to the court following its recent Telecom Tariff Order (TTO), COAI maintained that "Our differences are with the orders of the Regulator and not with any specific operator. Our intention is not to aggrieve any particular operator".
"Individual operators are free to pursue the interests of their own company vigorously under the framework of the laws of the land. However, the regulator's role is to ensure the competing claims of companies are appropriately handled in the interest of the entire industry," said COAI Director General Rajan S Mathews in an apparent response to Jio's ultimatum.
"This is the mandate of the TRAI Act, which specifically tasks it with ensuring the orderly growth of the industry. When we perceive this to not be the case, we raise our concerns, as any relevant industry association should, for the growth & development of the sector & in the interest of the nation," he said.
(with inputs from IANS)
Follow HT Tech for the latest tech news and reviews , also keep up with us on Twitter, Facebook, Google News, and Instagram. For our latest videos, subscribe to our YouTube channel.