Facebook rejected by Supreme Court in user-tracking lawsuit | HT Tech

Facebook rejected by Supreme Court in user-tracking lawsuit

The U.S. Supreme Court turned away an appeal by Facebook Inc., refusing to intervene in a lawsuit that accuses the company of violating a federal wiretapping law by secretly tracking the internet activities of users logged off the social-networking site.

By:BLOOMBERG
| Updated on: Mar 22 2021, 22:48 IST
Facebook.
Facebook.

The U.S. Supreme Court turned away an appeal by Facebook Inc., refusing to intervene in a lawsuit that accuses the company of violating a federal wiretapping law by secretly tracking the internet activities of users logged off the social-networking site.

The rebuff which came without comment leaves intact a federal appeals court decision letting four Facebook users press part of a suit over practices the company used in 2010 and 2011. The people are seeking class action status and as much as $15 billion.

You may be interested in

MobilesTablets Laptops
7% OFF
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
  • Black Titanium
  • 8 GB RAM
  • 256 GB Storage
28% OFF
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra 5G
  • Green
  • 12 GB RAM
  • 256 GB Storage
Google Pixel 8 Pro
  • Obsidian
  • 12 GB RAM
  • 128 GB Storage
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
  • Black
  • 6 GB RAM
  • 128 GB Storage

Facebook and its tech-industry allies say the ruling by the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals threatens to outlaw commonplace data-sharing techniques used to display online advertisements and other web content. Facebook's appeal centered on the U.S. Wiretap Act, a 1968 law that is also being invoked in privacy suits against Alphabet Inc.'s Google and Microsoft Corp.

Also read
Looking for a smartphone? To check mobile finder click here.

Also read: Facebook says it disabled more than 1.3 billion fake accounts between Oct-Dec 2020

The users say Facebook violated the Wiretap Act by creating “Like” and “Share” buttons that third parties could add to their websites as so-called plug-ins. The users say the plug-ins captured information about them and sent it to Facebook, even if they didn't click on the button.

The Wiretap Act bars the interception of someone else's electronic communication without consent, but makes an exception for a “party” to the communication.

Facebook contends that when a user visits a website with a plug-in, the person's browser sends information directly to the social-media company, making it a “party” under the law.

In rejecting that argument, the 9th Circuit said the exception doesn't apply when a company is collecting information surreptitiously, as is alleged in the Facebook case. A different federal appeals court, the Philadelphia-based 3rd Circuit, reached the opposite conclusion when it sided with Google in 2015 in a lawsuit over its placement of cookies on users' browsers.

Facebook now broadly discloses that it collects informationwhen people, even those without accounts, visit websites withthe company's plug-ins. Facebook reached a settlement over its privacy practices with the Federal Trade Commission in 2011.

Written by Greg Stohr.

Catch all the Latest Tech News, Mobile News, Laptop News, Gaming news, Wearables News , How To News, also keep up with us on Whatsapp channel,Twitter, Facebook, Google News, and Instagram. For our latest videos, subscribe to our YouTube channel.

First Published Date: 22 Mar, 22:48 IST
NEXT ARTICLE BEGINS