Sundar Pichai lands in soup over ‘Pakhandi Baba ki Kartut’ video, court seeks…

Sundar Pichai is the CEO of Alphabet, parent company of Google that owns video streaming platfrom YouTube.

By: AYUSHMANN CHAWLA
| Updated on: Dec 02 2024, 10:47 IST
Sundar Pichai lands in soup over ‘Pakhandi Baba ki Kartut’ video, court seeks…
The notice issued to Sundar Pichai, accuses YouTube of intentionally disregarding the court's order. (AP)

Sundar Pichai, CEO of Google, has been issued a contempt notice by a Mumbai court after YouTube failed to remove a defamatory video targeting the Dhyan Foundation and its founder, Yogi Ashwini. The video, titled "Pakhandi Baba ki Kartut," has been at the centre of a legal battle since March 2022 when a court order instructed its removal.

Court's Reprimand for Non-Compliance

On November 21, 2023, the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court in Ballard Pier issued the contempt notice against Pichai, accusing YouTube of intentionally disregarding the court's order. The Dhyan Foundation, a prominent animal welfare organisation, filed the original plea in October 2022, alleging that the video contained false and harmful claims that damaged its reputation.

You may be interested in

MobilesTablets Laptops
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
  • Obsidian
  • 16 GB RAM
  • 256 GB Storage
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 5G 1TB
  • Graygreen
  • 12 GB RAM
  • 1 TB Storage
Apple iPhone 14 Pro 1TB
  • Gold
  • 6 GB RAM
  • 1 TB Storage
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max 1TB
  • Gold
  • 6 GB RAM
  • 1 TB Storage

Also read: iPhone 17 Pro: 4 major changes Apple is likely to introduce in 2025

Also read
Looking for a smartphone? To check mobile finder click here.

The NGO argued that Google was applying "delay tactics" and making excuses to avoid taking down the video, despite causing significant harm to the Dhyan Foundation's credibility and to the reputation of Yogi Ashwini. In their statement, the foundation expressed frustration over YouTube's continued hosting of the video, even after the initial court ruling.

YouTube's Defence and Court's Rejection

In its defence, YouTube, citing the Information Technology (IT) Act, argued that as an intermediary, it should not be held liable for the content posted by users. The platform claimed that defamation does not fall under the categories for government intervention as per Section 69-A of the IT Act, suggesting the matter should be dealt with in civil court instead of criminal court.

Also read: Netflix users alert: Phishing scam targets credit card details across 23 countries, avoid fake links

However, the court dismissed YouTube's technical objections, ruling that the IT Act does not prevent criminal courts from intervening in such cases. The court noted that there was no legal precedent stating that criminal courts lacked jurisdiction to handle such issues, thus affirming the validity of the contempt petition.

Continued Legal Proceedings

The contempt case will be heard again on January 3, 2024. This ruling highlights ongoing tensions between tech platforms and Indian legal authorities over issues of online content moderation.

Catch all the Latest Tech News, Mobile News, Laptop News, Gaming news, Wearables News , How To News, also keep up with us on Whatsapp channel,Twitter, Facebook, Google News, and Instagram. For our latest videos, subscribe to our YouTube channel.

First Published Date: 02 Dec, 08:22 IST
NEXT ARTICLE BEGINS

Editor’s Pick